A candle burns on this Armenian altar

Today was the 50th Anniversary of the failed Tibetan uprising against Chinese rule.

Tibetans and their supporters throughout the world held protests and prayer vigils to mark the half-century point of living in exile- His Holiness the Dalai Lama being the most notable of the exile group.

As an Armenian Church, we lit a small candle on our altar as a reminder of our vigilance against injustice. We relate to a people living outside their country. The Armenian diaspora is a state created because of the occupation of our sacred and ancestral lands. Five decades or five centuries, its a question of staying strong, committed and ever-vigilant to the cause.

The plight of the Tibetans is one I understand all too well.

Rallies were held in cities in North America, Europe and Asia today. According to a VOA report, (http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-03-10-voa56.cfm) “Several lawmakers joined a march to the Chinese embassy in Australia’s capital, Canberra, to demand more freedom for Tibet. Police arrested four people who broke through fencing around a designated protest site.

Buddhist monks in Japan prayed for peace in Tibet, while Czech Environment MinisterMartin Bursik hoisted a Tibetan flag outside his office. The Czech Republic holds the rotating presidency of the European Union.

In Washington, State Department spokesman Robert Wood repeated the U.S. government’s callfor a substantive dialogue between the Chinese government and representatives of exiled Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama.


Actor Richard Gere, a supporter of Tibet hugs House Speaker Nancy Pelosi at the International Campaign for Tibet reception on Capitol Hill, 09 Mar 2009 On Monday, U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told lawmakers gathered for a commemoration of the uprising that the human rights situation in Tibet deteriorated over the past year.

China’s foreign ministry urged U.S. lawmakers Tuesday not to pass the resolution, saying it opposes any country interfering in its internal affairs.

In Nepal, hundreds of Tibetans held a mass prayer at a monastery near the capital, Kathmandu. Some shouted pro-Tibet slogans and scuffled with Nepalese police who were deployed at the site to prevent anti-China protests.

Taiwan’s main opposition party organized a pro-Tibet rally in the southern city of Kaohsiung, where it controls the local government. Pro-Tibet activists also held a candlelight vigil in Taiwan’s capital, Taipei, in memory of Tibetans killed by Chinese security forces
.

It is refreshing to see the world come together to rally against and protest injustice. It is remarkable that Pelosi is seen here as an advocate for Tibetan rights when she so easily reneged last year on her promises concerning Armenian Genocide recognition. She’s a reminder for me that in the end its all politics.

Still, for me, a grandson of Genocide survivors, having to explain to my children that the vast majority of our lands are occupied, and that truth is merely a bargaining chip for politicians en route to their material security, I find comfort in lighting this small candle and standing in solidarity with the Tibetans on this day. Fifty years is just a small bit of time and yet a life-time.

I pray for the Dalai Lama, and I know that the plight of the suffering are always in his prayers.

“Happiness is not something ready made. It comes from your own actions.” – Dalai Lama

Poor Guy – this is the second time

Originally posted on “MyChurch”
Fr Vazken
Fr Vazken | 13 Comments |

Today during Super Bowl XLIII, we received the sad news about Jack’s terrible accident. At first, I scrambled for news and it was very limited. Fortunately, there is Tivo and I rewound only to find that our suspicions were true. I couldn’t bear to watch. I kept rewinding over and over, to my disbelief. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqT_5f08Nxs

The temptation was there to slow-motion the event, but I resisted. Finally I found some information – at http://www.hangintherejack.com/

I’m mostly concerned because we went through this some 30+ years ago when they blew him up. Those of you who remember, his face was more defined before the explosion. But this accident was hard – especially the damage to his head. I wonder if its a conspiracy?

Jack has always been too trusting. The people around him have not been good advisers. They remind me of Mr. Hands. (Always ready to bring Sluggo around to take a shot at Mr. Bill.)

Anyway, I signed the card at the website on behalf of all of us. We look for Jack’s full and complete recovery.

Vartan
Vartan February 02, 2009
We’re pulling for you Jack.
Anush Avejic
Anush Avejic February 02, 2009

My thoughts have been with Jack all day. I keep logging onto the site looking for updates but all we know is massive head trauma. : ( When they showed him laying there, his eyes transformed to X’s……:::sigh::: so sad.

Suzie
Suzie February 02, 2009

what about the cracked head? like an egg-shell. poor thing.

you can’t leave us Jack. I’ll never be able to get breakfast after 10am if you do. we need you to get better soon!!

Fr Vazken
Fr Vazken February 03, 2009

Vartan – you are truly a man of compassion.
Anush – I think Phil holds the answers. Something is up and they’re not talking. Check out the ambulance driver’s boss! What’s that all about?
Suzie – your point is well taken. The idea that we may face a world where breakfast is served ONLY until 10 or 10:30 in frightening. He’s a CEO with foresight, vision and briliance – all inside that egg-shell.

Anush Avejic
Anush Avejic February 03, 2009
JACK CODED!!! Last update shows the doctors were going in!!!
www.hangintherejack.com
Fr Vazken
Fr Vazken February 04, 2009

Did I hear right? The the doctor ask for a hot glue gun?

Vartan
Vartan February 04, 2009
I had a Sourdough Jack today. Jack needs all the support he can get.
Fr Vazken
Fr Vazken March 01, 2009

Hey – I’ve been away for a few weeks and just got on line to check out what’s happening. I was very pleased to learn that Jack’s X-rays look VERY good!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ACWXsTXOjU&eurl=http://www.hangintherejack.com/&feature=player_embedded

Anush Avejic
Anush Avejic March 01, 2009
JACK’S BACK!!! I just received an update that Jack is out of his coma!!!
http://www.hangintherejack.com/jacksback/
Fr Vazken
Fr Vazken March 02, 2009
Hmmmm… there are too many factors that parallel other stories of this nature. When I first started the blog, I had a sub-theme of “second time” not realizing how this would work out. So what’s the deal between Phil and Jack? Jealousy? Greed? or??? Push the guy out of the way and then turn the company around YOUR way? Sounds very familiar… Fill in the blanks, or “Phil in the Box”!
Getzes Hagop! Your love for the product kept you alive during the worst days of your life.
Fr Vazken
Fr Vazken March 23, 2009

http://articles.latimes.com/2009/mar/17/business/fi-cotown-neil17
Jack in the Box feeds the social media beast
COMPANY TOWN
By Dan Neil

March 17, 2009
Jack has risen, hallelujah.
After being hit by a bus in a Super Bowl TV/Web commercial Feb. 1, Jack — the grand-tete CEO-mascot of Jack in the Box — emerged from his coma March 4, newly inspired. At Jack’s direction, the San Diego-based restaurant chain will undertake a brand makeover this spring, including a new logo (Duffy & Partners, Minneapolis), redesigned store environments and a new corporate website that launched Monday. Jack, I feel obliged to point out, is a fictional character.
You might have had your doubts if you spent the weekend, as I did, perusing the 81,000 or so Get Well messages posted on the company’s www.hangintherejack.com website, which monitored Jack’s convalescence. You might also have suspected a connection between cholesterol and appalling grammar, but that’s another subject. Although the vast majority of messages were innocuous and inane — “We love you, Jack,” “I wish I knew how to quit you, Jack,” etc. — a fair percentage were darker, weirder and potentially quite embarrassing for the company, which has 2,170 stores in 18 markets and more than $3 billion in annual sales.
Jessica Gallardo in Maine writes: “We so totally love you!!!! Defeat death!!! We would have sex with a mullhawk gorilla & the hobo under the sewer for you. We love you.”
O-kaayyyy.
Alexut in Utah: “Jack in the Box killed people. They have poor sanitary habits and spread disease across the nation. Plus it’s disgusting food.”
And of course a thousand variations of “Jack sucks!,” which is a less than optimum take-away from a marketer’s perspective.
What’s going on here? Call it the search for authenticity.
The six-week “Hang in There Jack” campaign (Secret Weapon Marketing, Santa Monica) was a remarkable document: a 360-degree social media event that mocked even as it exploited the power of YouTube, Twitter, Facebook and Flickr. Along the way it leveraged irony to the breaking point with “viral” cellphone and faux-paparazzi videos, ring tones and texting. Among the crowd-sourced content were 27 get-well videos from fans, some quite brilliant. A man in Hawaii bought Jack’s size-14 Bruno Magli shoe on EBay for $910. Now that’s buy-in.
“We were amazed, really,” says Jack in the Box vice president of marketing Terri Funk Graham. The videos have garnered more than 4.8 million views. Graham estimates that to score the same number of impressions solely with traditional media would have cost three times as much (she declined to say how much the total campaign cost). “Given the overwhelming amount of response and engagement, we feel we’ve hit a home run,” Graham says.
And yet there’s huge risk in throwing open company-sanctioned social media to the great unwashed, unlearned public — or, if you will, the troll-osphere.
Just ask Skittles. This month Skittles launched a home page redesign that centered on Twitter. Any tweet including the word “Skittles” was instantly transported to the brand’s online front porch. The hope, obviously, was that the candy’s fans would riff and rhapsodize about Tasting the Rainbow, and for a few hours, they did.
Within hours, however, Skittles’ Twitter feed was vandalized by key-stroking hooligans who proceeded to rain down obscene, racist and generally obnoxious tweets on the site — hundreds an hour.
The mildest of these hacks included comments such as “Skittles causes butt cancer” and “Skittles killed my brother.” Which, you’ve got to admit, is hilarious. Skittles, part of the Mars empire, undertook a hasty reorganization, sticking the Twitter feed under a much less prominent “Chatter” button.
The Skittles incident has become instant lore for social media marketers. And the lesson seems to be this: As eager as companies are to harness the marketing power of Web 2.0 — more than 1,000 companies now have social media outlets — Web-savvy users are a deeply cynical and hard-bitten bunch, having been marketed to since the instant of birth.
If a company appears to “brand-jack” social media, it will likely incur the revenge of the nerds. For social media to be effective, says Mark Avnet, a professor at Virginia Commonwealth University’s Brandcenter, it has to be reasonably transparent and unmediated, even anarchic.
“It has to have authenticity or it loses its social currency,” Avnet says.
And that means allowing your brand to be taken over at times by lunatics.The Web teams at Jack in the Box and Secret Weapon knew what was coming and braced themselves for the onslaught of trolls.
“For the social media portion of the campaign to be successful, we knew we needed to step aside and let consumers drive the online campaign,” Graham says. “While we monitored the postings and videos on the website, we only removed messages that were vulgar or included profanity.”
Or at least they tried. There are still plenty of messages such as Muzzi’s “Your food makes me poop.”
Jack may wish he were still in a coma.
dan.neil@latimes.com

Dn Jeff
Dn Jeff March 31, 2009
Having the distinct and rare privilege of having been a substitute Jack (in similar vain as the substitute Santa Claus that reaches for donations or attends to children’s requests in malls) with the original head and clown outfit during my youth (some 37 years ago!)… and having stood on the sidewalks of Concord, CA in said costume to wave at passing cars in front of the Jack in the Box… I must say I am relieved to see he has not met the final demise.Hang in their guy for all of us alum!Jeff

The New Spirit – Armenian Spiritual Music and more

Last month our In His Shoes Ministries released the new album: “Spirit” by Gor Mkhitarian. Here is a story published in Armenian Reporter newspaper, January 26, 2009. 

Gor Mkhitarian explores the realm of the sacred

The new sound of Armenian spiritual music

by Shahane Martirosyan

Published: Monday January 26, 2009

Gor Mkhitarian performs spiritual music at the release of his album Hogi (Spirit) at the Zipper Concert Hall in downtown Los Angeles, Dec. 18, 2008.

Los Angeles – On December 18, 2008, as Gor Mkhitarian took the stage and the lights dimmed, he sat on a chair with his guitar on his lap and began to sing: “Hayr mer, vor hergins es, surp yeghitsi anun ko. . . .”

The performance, at a concert celebrating the release of his seventh studio album, Spirit (Hoki) – held at the Zipper Concert Hall in downtown Los Angeles – probably marked the first time that “Hayr Mer” (the Lord’s Prayer) was being sung with guitar accompaniment in front of an audience.

While today spiritual and specifically religious compositions are a major component of world music, contemporary Armenian music has yet to warm to the idea of infusing spiritualism – or even spiritual elements – into new material. Mkhitarian is trying to change that.

Though far from being a strictly religious album in the vein of Christian rock, Spirit honors the great ancient tradition of Armenian sacred music and introduces a thoroughly modern spiritual – and humanistic – musical idiom that has been sorely lacking in much of Armenian pop and rock.

Spirit is the fruit of a collaborative effort between Mkhitarian and Fr. Vazken Movsesian, founder of the Armenian Church Youth Ministries and the In His Shoes Mission. Arguing that it is important to make spiritual music resonate with today’s audiences, and young audiences in particular, Fr. Movsesian says: “From the church’s early saints, like Gregory the Illuminator and Mesrob Mashdots, to the prayerful lives of Nerses Shnorhali and Grigor Narekatsi, from the melodies of Sayat-Nova to [the compositions and arrangements of] Komitas Vardapet, the message was given in a language understood by all.”

“This is the first time we are trying to create new, modern, spiritual songs,” Mkhitarian echoes.

A breath of fresh air

As he came of age in his native Vanadzor, Armenia, Mkhitarian was enamored of rock music. He also sang in a church choir. “I grew up listening to the rock heroes of the 1970s,” he recalls. Since then his musical tastes have evolved in leaps and bounds. “If you kill me now, I cannot listen to the Rolling Stones,” says Mkhitarian, who these days is fond of acts such as Coldplay and the Dave Matthews Band.

In 1996, when Armenia still faced enormous hardships, Mkhitarian joined his brother-in-law, Mher Manukian, to start the band Lav Eli.

Acclaimed as an innovative underground rock group that genuinely reflected the angst of a society in flux, Lav Eli released two well-regarded albums before disbanding. “There was a point when we decided to do different things,” Mkhitarian says, referring to his desire at the time for bolder experimentation with various musical genres and even instruments.

Losing no time to make good on his vision, Mkhitarian wrote fresh material following Lav Eli’s breakup and recorded a demo tape that was eventually released, in 2001, by the newly created Pomegranate­Music label in Boston. The debut CD, an acoustic collection titled Yeraz, brought a breath of fresh air into contemporary Armenian folk music and featured instruments such as the banjo and dumbek, in addition to guitars.

Creative diversity

Since Yeraz, the artist’s six subsequent albums have seen a diversity of excursions into rock, pop, and folk. Mkhitarian, whose records have been released under his own Gor­Music label since 2004, also put out an English-language album, titled Green Grass.

Commenting on the eclectic quality of his work, Mkhitarian, a resident of Los Angeles since 2003, says, “I offer something different – not something unique, just something different.”

He adds that as the release of his latest effort, Spirit, was nearing, he didn’t know how to brand the album. “I have touched on too many genres,” he notes. “It’s a folkloric album, yet some people call it alternative while others see it as underground, sub-genre, post-depressionism.” Mkhitarian prefers to describe the record as an essentially rock album that offers a “Pearl Jam/Seattle Sound feel with a touch of Armenian folk.”

The album’s concept is credited to both Mkhitarian and Fr. Movsesian, who has introduced the artist to the In His Shoes Mission. A nonprofit organization open to people of all religious backgrounds and persuasions, In His Shoes was established in response to acts of ethnic cleansing such as the Armenian Genocide. Through rallies, fundraisers, and other public events, the organization provides support to marginalized populations and strives to help end hunger throughout the world.

All proceeds from Mkhitarian’s latest album will be donated to the In His Shoes Mission.

While several songs on Spirit carry a specifically Christian message, Mkhitarian stresses the universal nature of the album’s spiritualism. “I want people to get exactly what they want out of it,” he says, explaining that his goal is ultimately to help listeners achieve a certain inner awakening, whether or not they choose to see it connected with their particular religious beliefs.

 

 

 

 

Not a dry eye – 20 years later

Not a dry eye – 20 years later
Fr Vazken
Fr Vazken | 3 Comments |
I’ve heard that expression “Not a dry eye in the house” in reference to a performance or speech well delivered. But I thought it was a cliche and an over-exageration of terms. But it came to pass yesterday at the 20th Anniversary of the Armenian Earthquake.

At the conclusion of the Divine Liturgy and just before Holy Communion, we stopped the service, precisely 20 years to the minute – 11:41AM when a devastating earthquake hit Northern Armenia and killed 25,000+ people.

The memories are vivid in my mind. And apparently, so too in the minds and hearts of all our parishioners. There wasn’t a dry eye in the house when we began our service. With our soloist, Mariam Abrahamian’s powerful, yet soul stirring rendition of Naregatzi’s lament. Followed by two new songs composed and performed by Gor Mkhitarian. I don’t know – I know our church on the corner is magical, but I keep getting these reminders that shock me. Like you could feel the Presence and you could feel the swaying emotions as these songs were sung. And the final rendition of Hayr Mer (the Lord’s Prayer) to guitar music… where else could this magic have taken place?

I know there were dinner dances and ‘Christmas’ parties that were beckoning our people (and us) but for my part – I think we honored the past and truly gave a tribute to the present in this short memorial. Thanks to all of you who made this day a special one.

More to come…

More posts from Fr Vazken Share:

Anush Avejic
Anush Avejic December 08, 2008

It was a very emotional service… First hearing the power in Mariam Abrahamian’s voice…singing this beautiful haunting melody. Though we remembered our past, it was a testament that we are still alive and strong! Then Gor’s songs. I was moved to tears by the words of his beautifully written songs. So heartfelt, so sincere. I looked over from where I was sitting and there was one of our little medz mairig’s….keeping beat to the music with her being. Like you said in your introduction, the language of music transcends boundaries. We were all ages, all different kinds of “hyes”, and it didn’t matter. The music bound us to our people….and to our church.

I can’t wait til Gor’s concert. We just heard a preview of his new music yesterday….I’m anxiously waiting for the new CD.

Thank you for organizing this beautiful service in a way that only our church would. In humilty and in memorium of our loss, but in encouragement of our present and our future.

Suzie
Suzie December 09, 2008
I second the reference to ‘not a dry eye in the house’. Sunday’s special remembrance service was very moving and I found myself wiping away tears. Anush, I agree – Gor’s words and singing was truly heartfelt and sincere – hence bringing us to tears. They were both tears of sorrow for our losses in the past as well as tears of joy from being lifted from that devastation and continuing to build a life filled with the power of hope and love.
Fr Vazken
Fr Vazken December 09, 2008
You know – in preparing for the Christmas SPIRIT concert I’ve been thinking a lot about change in our Church.Obviously, the Gor music is pretty radical change when you think of the Armenian Church, or any ‘traditional’ church for that matter. Anush – your comments about the mayrigs – made me think about all of the changes and differences that I’ve tried to bring into the Armenian Church during my years as a priest. I never thought of it until now – but its always been that older generation who got it. Maybe its the years, maybe its the futility that they see in preserving something that doesn’t speak to the people. But, among the younger ones there is this false sense of clinging to something that makes for a warm security blanket. (Yes, I saw Charlie Brown’s Christmas last night… poor Linus, he needs all the security he can get with that dew of his.) And they fight for that security which gets them through the years, but in the end, there’s nothing in it.This weekend we’re in for a treat – because Mariam Matossian arrives and will be singing at our church (and of course, at the concert). She’s going to be leading a special class for our Sunday School students this Sunday and it should be interesting because we’ll be uniting the past tradition with the more radical change.

Suzie, I believe you told me about one of our visitors this Sunday who mentioned that our church really had that unique balance of old and new, or traditional and contemporary. That’s what its all about, right? I mean, none of us are for abandoning our traditional worship and our Badarak, BUT on the other hand, we know that those are not the END we serve. I think that perspective – that traditions are the means, and Jesus is the end – has been our working platform. And it shows in every project we do.

On top of it all – did you catch this week’s Gospel passage? It was the story of the Great Banquet. As I was sitting through Gor’s playing and Mariam’s singing and subsequently the hokehankist – I had the great banquet in mind. This is not Burger King – you can’t “have it your way!” We are a church that is led by the Holy Spirit and the Pastor – the Parish Priest – is ORDAINED by the mark of the Holy Spirit. When he points the church in a particular direction, its because of his prayer life, his knowledge of the communities and the needs of the parishioners. The Holy Spirit guides the pastor to leadership. And as the Pastor, this direction that we have steered our ship on – I will tell you in no uncertain terms – is the path and direction for the Armenian Church today. Because its the same path we’ve been on through the centuries. This is the orthodox path.

Critics point to orthodoxy as something ancient and connected to the fathers of the church. They forget that those fathers were humans guided by the same Spirit! The Orthodox Church is alive today, not just in some history book.

The banquet passage is too close to my heart to let pass by. I’m going to use it as the theme for tomorrow’s podcast and will return to it next Sunday at church (since this past week, we had a musical sermon). I keep thinking about Nersess Shnorhali or Krikor Naregatzi. We love their works today – I wonder how they were received in their time? They were people like you and I, certainly with a gift for touching the soul with their words and tunes – a gift which Gor has. And their message was the same from the time of Christ.

Looking forward to a great couple of weeks of Christmas cheer.

Half Life along side a Full Life

“The half-life of a quantity whose value decreases with time is the interval required for the quantity to decay to half of its initial value. The concept originated in describing how long it takes atoms to undergo radioactive decay, but also applies in a wide variety of other situations.” (Wikipedia, 09/26/08)

Today is my half-life. I’ve spent exactly half of my life as a priest.

My mother has a friend who calls me by my baptismal name, Hovsep, because she claims that’s how she’s known me. Of course, this is an excuse to offer her some skewed sense of personal validation, as someone who knew me “when…”. But as of today, the excuse doesn’t hold much water; I have lived an equal number of days as Vazken and as Hovsep. Tomorrow the scale tips the other way.

People struggle with identity issues all their life. Early on, I would have probably said I struggled between two identities but now I understand them to be the same. A priest’s name-change only marks the pre- and post-ordination periods of his life, but his identity as a priest has been established before his ordination, as we believe his calling predates his taking vows.

I was named after the great patriarch of the Armenian people, Vazken I (Catholicos from 1955-1995). I was honored that my ordaining bishop, Archbishop Vatché Hovsepian, named me after the venerable Catholicos. Vazken I was consecrated as the chief shepherd of the Armenian Church, almost three decades earlier, on that (this) same day. (It also happens to be Gomidas Vartabed’s (Soghomon Soghomonian’s) birthday.)

A couple of weeks ago, a communiqué came to us from the Diocese, instructing a special Hokehankist (Requiem Service) to be conducted on Sunday, September 21, for the late Pontiff, Vazken I. They were marking the 100th anniversary of his birth. Here we go again… I thought. Like, don’t we as the Armenian Church – the LIVING CHURCH of JESUS CHRIST – have ANY OTHER service beside requiem services? Like, isn’t it possible to celebrate instead of mourn? And, to add insult to injury (my mental injury, that is), the day of the requiem was September 21 – Armenian Independence Day! Just 17 years earlier, Armenia, after being locked and squelched by the Soviet communist state for 70 years, proclaimed its independence. Was it asking much to come up with another way of celebrating this man’s life, especially on a joyous day as Independence Day? I know, I know, it’s Einstein’s other theory: “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results.” It is the same old regime, why am I expecting anything different?

So I’d like to offer some thought on the life of His Holiness Vazken I. As someone who is honored to have received his name, as someone who was certainly touched on several occasions by the presence and soul of this giant among men, I peered at his life from a unique vantage point. Here I am 26 years now, with the name of this man, who really shaped me, and gave me the opportunity to serve our Church.

For us, growing up in America, Vazken I, was an icon. He was bigger than life. Long before simulated worlds dominated electronically enhanced imaginations, there was the concept of a “virtual Armenia.” In the 1950’s, 60’s and 70’s, Armenia was only experienced virtually. My grandmother visited her sisters in Armenia in 1960 and 1967. I remember when she went it was as if she had gone to the North Pole. It was somewhere in our imaginations – there were no travel guides and books. Magazines from Armenia used a very primitive screening process on their pictures making the images very difficult to decipher. There was a Life-magazine-wanna-be called “Soviet Life” but they were as difficult to find here in America as Life magazine was in the Soviet Union. In 1968 “Soviet Life” featured Armenia, and that was our first glimpse at the homeland.


But the main images that defined our virtual Armenia were Mount Ararat and Holy Etchmiadzin. Ararat was always sketched, drawn or photographed with two peaks and snow atop the summits. We had heard that it was in the boundaries of Turkey, but that didn’t mean too much to us. Ararat was the Armenian mountain. Period. Like the genocide, from which we all came, Ararat was not up for debate. It was just accepted as the Armenian mountain. We had t-shirits, signs, posters and all kinds of markings with the double-peaked mountain, and we all identified it as the symbol of Armenia. The other image, Holy Etchmiadzin, was a generic symbol of the Armenian Church. I don’t think we even realized it was the monastery itself, but the image came to mean “Armenian Church.” And put them together – Etchmiadzin against the backdrop of Ararat – and you had instant branding for Armenia! No need to pay anyone on Madison Avenue for this kind of recognition – it was built into us.

Growing up in America, we also had some idea of the Soviets. The adults would speak about them as “bad guys” but it wasn’t until Ronald Reagan’s time, in the 1980s, that he ascribed the term “Evil Empire” to the Union. We just knew that Armenia was locked into the Soviet Union, and as much as we called it “Armenia” for ourselves, to the outside world it was one big blob called the Soviet Union, and often times “Russia.” I remember this would drive me crazy. I knew we weren’t Russian, but it was just too easy for the Americans to paint it all with a broad stroke. If we wanted to write a report for school about Armenia, we’d have to search the indexes of the Encyclopedias or the Almanacs as a sub-category of the Soviet Union. And there it was “Armenia SSR” the smallest republic!

So amidst the cold war, a small nation and a small group of people behind that nation, we had a hero. He became the icon of the Armenian people. He was the Catholicos Vazken I. When he came to America, it was not only the head of the Church visiting, but for us he was the head of the nation. After all, everywhere the post-Genocide generation established itself, they lifted a dome and consecrated their churches. Church and state were intertwined.

In 1960, His Holiness Vazken I became the first Catholicos to visit the United States. He was a man of principle. He was a man who believed in doing right. In Los Angeles, the church community had rented the Shrine Auditorium (of Academy Awards fame) for the Catholicos to celebrate the Divine Liturgy. That day, the Pontiff came out of his car to a waiting crowd of several thousand. He looked up and saw the star and crescent on top of the auditorium and refused to celebrate the Liturgy under the Islamic symbol that was the banner for the murder of 1.5 Million of his people during the 1915 Genocide. He couldn’t justify Armenian churches being empty that day, while he was at this auditorium. And so, the thousands in waiting were moved to the nearby St. James church on Adams Blvd.

I had a chance to meet with Vazken I in 1960, then in 1968 when I was 12 and later when I went to seminary. In the evenings, he’d take a stroll through the grounds of the monastery, and we young seminarians would be on our guard – what if the Catholicos caught us NOT studying?
He came to America for the last time in 1987, and we celebrated the Divine Liturgy at the Hollywood Bowl. It was a memorable occasion, probably because he was older. We met him in San Francisco and he gave a blessing on my son Varoujan. He was the father figure we all understood him to be.

Vazken I was a charismatic individual. I remember at the time he passed away (1994), I was editing a publication called “Window: View of the Armenian Church” along with Hratch Tchilingirian. We were responsible for providing the information for so much of the Armenian Church immediately following the collapse of the communist state. It gave us a very special vantage point to analyze the happenings of the Armenian Church. I remember a conversation off-line with Hratch, where we were discussing the greats of the Armenian Church. It was obvious that the demise of Vazken I was really the end of an era.

I wrote an article for my parish newsletter, “Nakhagoch” immediately following the death of Vazken I. I reprint it here for a few reasons. First, I think its important that we recognize and honor our dead not only with requiems, but with tributes to their legacy. Second, as I write in the article, the greats become great for shaking the world, yes, but because they shake lives. Certainly, Vazken I shook my life. Finally, as I begin my 26th year as Vazken the priest, I want to keep a living tribute to this giant, but living out the ideals that were important to him and overlap my ministry.

Personal Reflections on the Passing of His Holiness Vazken I
by Fr. Vazken Movsesian
September 1994

It was early Thursday morning when I logged onto SAIN. There, with my usual email was a message from Istanbul, Turkey: His Holiness Vazken I Catholicos of All Armenians of beloved memory has entered eternal rest this morning (18 August 1994) in Yerevan.

It wasn’t shocking news, after all the Catholicos had been ill for some time now. Nevertheless, the message sent my mind wandering.

In the quiet morning hours, with the hum of a hard drive twirling, looking at this message on my computer screen, I couldn’t help but contemplate about His Holiness, the Church he represented and the future direction of the Church in our new society. Accelerating my thoughts was the fact that here, a priest of an ancient, conservative orthodox church was learning about the passing of the patriarch via a dynamic and progressive medium.We are standing at a pivotal point in the history of the Armenian Church.

It hasn’t been long since the Armenian Church has been forced to serve its congregation on foreign soils. His Holiness, the late Catholicos, had a difficult challenge before him when he took office. Post World War II Society, Stalinism, McCarthyism here in the States, the Cold War were the outside factors, while schisms among the Armenian people had contributed to assassinations and internal fighting. Yet the 47 year old bishop from Rumania took the helm of our ancient Church and became the 140th successor to the Apostolic throne.

He fought the atheism of the Soviet state with caution and tact. The fact that Armenia enjoyed a religious life and the Kevorkian seminary operated was a testament to His Holiness’ diplomatic style.

I had the good fortune and honor to meet His Holiness on several occasions. His first visit to the United States was in 1960. My parents were ACYO members and met the Catholicos as representatives of the Church youth group. I was four years old and remember him only as a warm and kind father. My mother had sewn him a cross holder and presented it to him that day. This gift he used for many years to come.

The cross holder made our next meeting, in 1968, a possibility. It was more than an opportunity to be off of school that day that made me want to accompany my parents to visit him in Los Angeles. I was 12 years old and going through the usual adolescent struggle to find identity. His Holiness was the embodiment of everything Armenian. After all, he was the “leader” coming from the homeland.

I remember being captivated by his charisma. He was overpowering, yet humble. He allowed this young boy to stay with him for a day and share some precious moments together. You would look at him and know that you were in the presence of a man who took his commitment and position seriously. This meeting had a great impact on my life.

It wasn’t until after I finished college, that I had another opportunity to meet him. This time our meeting was on Armenian soil. Our primate, Archbishop Vatché took me to Etchmiadzin in 1977 where I had the golden opportunity to study at the birthplace of our Faith and under His Holiness’ shadow. We would meet with him, once a week for classes in human psychology. Though the material was outdated by contemporary standards, it was the personal dialogues in which we engaged that made this a true learning experience.

The time I spent in Etchmiadzin is dream-like now. We would see the Catholicos daily when he walked in the garden, at the dinner table or in the church.

In 1982, we met in a more spiritual way. I was ordained to the sacred order of priesthood on September 26, on the anniversary date of His Holiness’ consecration as the Catholicos. On this occasion, Archbishop Vatché named me Vazken, in remembrance of that anniversary.

The last time we met was in 1987 when His Holiness made his last pontifical visit to the States. He was tired and the age and struggle of his people were catching up with him. Nonetheless, he did not cease to inspire us. As faithful of St. Andrew, we greeted him at various functions and services held here in the Bay Area. On the last day of his visit I was honored to accept on behalf of the St. Andrew parishioners, a gold hand cross, which now sits on our altar.In the weeks to come, you will be reading in the Armenian press many biographies about a giant of a man, about a patriarch who held the reigns of the Armenian Church for almost four decades, about the inner struggles and national aspirations of a father.

In these few paragraphs, I’ve briefly outlined his influence in my life. Sometimes we project upon our leaders and ‘heroes’ bigger-than-life images with global influences and impact. Unfortunately we forget that their greatest work is on the human level transforming their concerns to action – hugging a little boy, spending time with a young man, teaching a student and inspiring with form and actions. This is how the late Catholicos touched my life.

As for e-mail and hard drives, we will always have tools. But inspiration is something we can only get from humans who have souls, dreams and love.

I thank God for the opportunity to have known His Holiness Vazken I, as a leader, teacher and father. May God rest his soul and continue to provide us with inspiration.

Abandonment and Loneliness – then and now

What if someone cared in 1915?

Abandonment… Loneliness… Yesterday, the lectionary pointed us to the Gospel of St. Mark. We read the story of Jesus calming the sea (Mark 4:35f). Apart from the made-for-television scene of Jesus rebuking the storm and saving the ship, there is a very important question asked by the disciples that points to one of our biggest fears: abandonment.

The disciples are on board a small boat when the sea swells and the winds rock them back and forth. There is an immediate danger of capsizing. Quickly they look for their life-saver, and he – Jesus – is asleep in the back of the boat. They ask him, “Don’t you care that we are perishing?” It’s a very logical and natural question: “Why have your abandoned us now in our hour of need?”
Abandonment and loneliness are some of the scariest feelings that we have. I know as a child we are scared of the dark, not because we can’t see anything in the space, but because of the loneliness that is in the darkness. Think about it, we take a brother or a sister, maybe a friend to walk into the dark room with us – even a small little puppy dog – and we are comforted. Having someone next to us eases our fears. But when we are left alone, we’re frightened. And it is this sense of abandonment that the disciples felt when they turned to Jesus for help. They were left alone and on top of it all, they thought he did not care.

I think about this abandonment in reference to the Armenian Genocide. Why were we left alone in 1915? Even more, what if someone really cared in 1915? The question has resurfaced for me in many different forms and at different times. When I first read Ambassador Morgenthau’s letters from Turkey, describing the atrocities I wondered, “Why didn’t anyone care?” How could the Ambassador of the United States be documenting such violations against human life and all of it falling on deaf ears?

And to think, not even two decades after the end of the Armenian Genocide, Hitler used the world’s indifference to rally support for his entry into Poland.

The same question resurfaced for me a few years back when I returned from a trip to Rwanda. What was going on? Why didn’t the world care? How could we even fathom the idea of genocide in today’s modern world? Flashing in front of my eyes were the picture of the three chimps – see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil. Maybe in that same ape-like fashion, the answer was simply to ignore it and it will go away.

I know I can’t change the past, but I can definitely do something about today and the future.
Today, genocide is taking place in the Sudan. In a remote area called Darfur millions of people have been displaced and hundreds of thousands have been massacred, raped, tortured and exterminated. Darfur is the Turkey of 2008. The neighboring areas in Chad are the Der Zors of 2008. The enemy is the same.

It is easy to identify the enemy as the Turks in 1915 or the Janjaweed in 2008. The bigger enemy is more difficult to recognize but equally destructive. It’s our collective indifference to the pain and destruction of others. It’s the same enemy we Armenians had in 1915. It’s the same enemy the Darfuri people have today.

Fortunately, the blind, deaf and dumb monkeys are just a few this time around. In fact, I’m pleased to note that some very important and prominent people have risen to the occasion and lent their voice to the people of Darfur. Whether Don Cheadle, George Clooney or Mia Farrow, they have all offered their celebrity status to get the word out and in so doing, challenged us.

The turn is ours now as Armenians. As the victims of the first genocide of the 20th Century, don’t we have a duty to be the first to speak out against genocide today? The time is here for us to lend our voices and our status to get the word out about Darfur.

Gabriel Stauring Person of the Year

When I met Gabriel Stauring he was running a mock refugee camp called “Camp Darfur.” We spent four days with him at the camp, located near the runway at LAX, getting the word out to whoever would listen. The location was appropriate – no one really cares about who’s around, as long as you’re not in the way of the planes. And we weren’t. Just like the people in Armenia in 1915 or Darfur in 2008, “As long as they’re not disrupting the flow, let them be,” says the world.

Later, Gabriel followed his calling and made a series of trips to the Chad/Darfur border. There he spent time with the refugees of the Genocide inside the camps. He has made five trips—leaving family and the comforts of home behind—just to get the word out about Darfur. He has broadcasted video stories and pictures to the world from those camps.

What if someone cared in 1915? We will never know the answer to that question. But we can be a part of the answer today – someone does care about the Genocide in Darfur.

This coming Friday, September 5, In His Shoes Ministries will be honoring Gabriel Stauring as its “2008 Person of the Year.” This annual award is given to someone who exemplifies the goals and purpose of the organization, that is, someone who walks in the shoes of others to experience and alleviate their pain. The event will take place at the Barnsdall Gallery Theatre in Hollywood, beginning at 7:00PM.

In His Shoes Ministries is pleased to award Gabriel this honor along with a $5,000 grant to help with his work in Darfur. We can’t change the past, but we can do something about today and tomorrow. We definitely owe it to the people of yesterday by helping the people who suffer the same fate today.

The event will also feature two new musical creations by Gor Mkhitarian. These are part of a set of spiritual songs to be released at the end of the year as a CD. The In His Shoes Ministries is convinced that issues of justice and peace can be solved on a spiritual realm and this CD one part of the larger effort.

In addition, artist Gregory Beylerian will be unveiling his latest creation called, “Universal Spiral of Peace” which was developed at the first “Person of the Year” award last year, honoring Rwandan Genocide survivor Ben Kayumba.

The public is invited to participate in this very special event. The evening promises to be one of enlightenment and definition. It is beyond tragedy that the world allows and tolerates genocide at the start of the 21st century. Certainly, the bigger tragedy would be for us to stand idle in the face of the current genocide in Darfur.

When I was in Rwanda I met with a group of ladies at Solace Ministries. They were at a gathering where two hundred widows were finding support through counseling and prayer. They were all victim-survivors of the Rwandan Genocide. The vast majority of them had been raped. The vast majority of them had HIV-AIDS.

These were the victims that were “allowed” to live. Why? Because since they had contracted the AIDS virus, they would soon infect the rest of the population. Basically, they were allowed to live so that they could finish the work of the murderers.

In our Armenian community, sadly we have a virus with which the enemy has strategically infected us. It’s indifference. It’s a big one – it contributes to the bloodless massacre. Without guns, sword or weapons, they can finish us off. I hope and pray that we don’t succumb to that indifference. It’s an ape-like behavior to close our mouths, eyes and ears. We can do better.

Please join us this Friday evening. You can get more information and tickets at www.inhisshoes.org. All contributions go to supporting the people of Darfur.

Zaven Jendian – like a comet – now the stardust…

I returned from Zaven Avedis Jendian’s funeral in San Diego. I know after last night’s podcast and the musical dedication some of you were asking – what was happening? I didn’t get into details, but had to mention him and the other loss we had this week. There is a weblog available with a day-to-day of Zaven’s short life (7/17 to 8/18). http://ajendian.wordpress.com/

Zaven’s parents, Aleen and Micah, opened their life to all of us. They gave us a chance to share this precious life and in return I’d like to share some thoughts here from the day behind us.

Today we were all humbled by the Aleen and Micah’s incredible courage and faith. You know, life is played by a different set of rules when you have faith. We all witnessed that over the last month. We watched silently today as Micah picked up the small casket and brought it to the altar. Later he walked in procession with the sad songs of the church – and laid the casket on the grave.

The prayers of the Armenian Church are just incredible. They hit right home. They talk about the tragedy of life-ended-early, but in the context of the larger universal truths, the tragedy is mellowed.

At the grave I was asked to say a few words – a type of eulogy. I wasn’t expecting to talk, but didn’t hesitate. Aleen and Micah have a very special place in my heart. I was with them at the start of their family’s life at the holy altar a decade or so ago, and I needed to be there today as well.

I remember my mind went blank. What can you say in such intense pain? I stared the eulogy with the words “In the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit” not only to signal the beginning, but as a petition to get some help. I figured if I invoked the Trinity, I could be the vessel for Their Holy Comfort.

This is where the Spirit led me…
We are conditioned to make sense out of the senseless. Every day we hear of children dying in wars and from famine. We turn the channel or turn the page of the newspaper. Today’s news, we can’t escape.

It may be common for people to look at Micah and Aleen with pity. But I would venture to say that the two of them would be the first to admit themselves very blessed to have been touched by Zaven’s life. And as painful as this separation is, the underlying reality that they were touched by a life from God is overwhelming.

If we really look at the meaning of the word “angel” we understand that we were all touched by an angel. Zaven was an angel that came to us. An angel is a messenger and Zaven brought us some very profound and fundamental messages, namely that life is precious. Life is delicate. That life is a blessing. I remember a couple of weeks ago when we played the John Lennon piece – written to his son Sean – he has a beautiful line in there “Life is what happens to you while you’re busy making other plans.” It seemed so appropriate for the lesson of the day. We really aren’t in control, despite all the advances in technology and knowledge that we’ve made and all the wealth and power we’ve accumulated. We’re not in control.

Finally, the angel’s message came on his death day – on the feast of the Assumption of the Holy Mother of God – it was a message that came through Zaven, about another parent, a mother, who didn’t understand why she had to let go of her Child.

Zaven’s life came like a comet. It was quick and judging by the size of the crowd gathered to say goodbye, this comet had blanketed a large section of life’s sky. And when comets go out of our sight, they leave a trail of stardust. I saw that stardust on top of everyone who was there today. They were being sprinkled with the love that Zaven brought to this world.

It is customary to end a eulogy, in the Armenian Church, with the wish, “May God rest his soul…” I don’t think there’s any doubt today that God has rested this tiny soul. Its now our turn to keep in mind all that this little precious life came to teach us.

Styrofoam, a Green Valley and Recycling Junk

Before it was known as Silicon Valley, the area around San Jose – the Santa Clara Valley, was also known as the Valley of the Heart’s Delight. The phrase described the area well and I had the good fortune to serve there during some transitional times.

With Susan, we were assigned to the Armenian Church of Santa Clara in 1982. During that time the community grew and by the grace of God we built a church, a social hall, strengthened the Armenian language program, established Bible studies and Sunday Schools, started scouting with HMEM and a senior support group called Aghpiur. The community received a new name, St. Andrew – the first called (Nakhagoch) disciple of Christ. He became my patron saint and his name became a unique call and mission for our community. Being the first meant being a leader, not always finding favor with the masses, but treading the water so others may follow.

Outside the Armenian Church community, the larger area was transitioning as the leader of technology and innovation for the world. It would be known as Silicon Valley. Gates, Jobs, Wozniak, Allen, all names that sound big today – but just regular boys around town then. There was a granary, a couple of blocks from our home in Cupertino – it became the home of Apple Computer. We watched apricot orchards get cut down to make way for technology and egg-carton housing. Garage start-ups became the HP’s and Sun Microsystems of the Valley. For me, a small Timex computer opened the door to electronics for God’s work. I attended user-group meetings with electronic eggheads who would become the pioneers of technology within their fields. I remember another computer along the way – something called a Coleco system with tape drives. Then in 1985 Susan surprised me with an Apple IIc and I got hooked on programming.

By 1989 our church community had a presence in the Silicon Valley. That year Susan was selected by the city as the chairman of San Jose Beautiful and in charge of the Arbor Day celebration. We were expecting Sevan at the time, and he went along for the ride – up until Arbor Day, just a couple of weeks before he arrived into our lives.

We planted an apricot tree (Prunus armeniaca, “Armenian plum” in Latin) in Prush park and another tree with a plaque in Plaza park. The plaque had Susan’s design of a tree growing from a globe which served as the symbolic roots of life.

That same year, our church kids came out and danced in costumes and all. In the spirit of green, one of our kids, Karine Manoukian attended the church’s Ladies’ Society meeting and talked about the dangers of Styrofoam, trying to move the Ladies to a policy of purchasing recyclable goods. But, they told her that paper cups were too expensive.

This past weekend, a small group of us were up in San Jose to attend a graduation from San Jose State and to have a “mini pilgrimage” to two shrines that have been very powerfully moving in my life – the St. Andrew Armenian Church in Cupertino and the Sts. Peter & Paul Orthodox Church in Ben Lomond.

We arrived in San Jose near midnight. Suzie Shatarevyan, our graduate, was waiting with family to make sure we settled and to offer Armenian coffee, as only her mom could prepare: on a hotplate at the Fairmont! Very impressive and of course, there’s nothing like jolting the system at midnight with Armo coffee and making sure that every super-caffeinated grind enters your system. That night we took a stroll through the park just outside the hotel – it was Plaza park. We had to look for our tree and our plaque. We walked right up to it. Tree and plaque were as old as Sevan – 19 years old.

The next morning we attended Suzie’s graduation at San Jose State University. It was back in 1986 we were there last – for Susan’s commencement exercise. It was a bit surreal as we stood and in many respects we felt we had come full circle – sort of a recycling of thoughts and experiences. The university is the oldest public institution of higher learning in the state. Today it “powers Silicon Valley.” (http://www.sjsu.edu)

The keynote was given by San Jose Mayor, Chuck Reed. He outlined his “Green Vision” for the city. (http://www.sanjoseca.gov/mayor/goals/environment/GreenVision/GreenVision.asp) He spoke well and at the conclusion of the ceremonies the graduates received their degrees.

Just a few days back, last Sunday to be exact, Archbishop Vatche Hovsepian gave the sermon at our church. He spoke about graduation and the Armenian word “shrjanavard.” Literally, it means to finish a period (of time). He went on to explain that you never really can say you graduate anything – its only different periods and stations in your life that you finish, and then begins the new one. As I looked out at the graduates, it was hard to dismiss these words. You realize – its rather overwhelming – that there is so much to learn and so much to absorb.

Sunday morning, we went to St. Andrew. A small pilgrimage had begun. Karine Manoukian was playing the organ. We sang in the choir, along with Christaphor. Anahid conducted. I couldn’t help but notice her hands, giving the beat and tempo. My mind went to the outdoor masses we celebrated in the cold, when we had no church. I thought of the badaraks we celebrated under scaffolding. I looked at her hands, and saw years of service and 100’s, if not 1000s of songs, hymns and people being conducted.

Fr. Datev, always gracious to us, gave a nice sermon and the service ended. On my last visit, Karine played Paul McCartney’s “Junk” as I left the altar. Today, it was a mellow day. No junk. But I had a chance to talk to Karine. I asked her to continue our talk down in the social hall over coffee. She reminded me that the Ladies’ policy was still in effect: they hadn’t broken away from Styrofoam. Nothing had changed – nothing had been recycled.

With the celebration of the Eucharist, we were fulfilled spiritually and physically. I looked around the beautiful building – knowing the stories and the process that transpires, either helps you appreciate something or could make you completely be repulsed. Fortunately, the former is the case for me.

We drove to Ben Lomond to complete the weekend. Forty-five minutes of windy roads through some of the most beautiful areas on earth – the Saratoga hills. There stood Sts. Peter and Paul Orthodox Church. I had been here on several occasions, and each time had been emotionally moving – in fact to an extreme degree. This time, though, I found myself in a mellow mood. We had a nice group attending, some Orthodox believers and we picked up Nersess, from Stanford. He’s a deacon in the Armenian Church and joined us on this small excursion.

We met up with Fr. Andrew. He was very cordial and open with us. After some words and exchange of thoughts we sang and prayed before the altar and in the company of the saints. I am always touched by the positioning of the icons in this small sanctuary, because they are actually standing in the room with us. See an article I wrote about the church in the early 1990’s: http://www.sain.org/WINDOW/Denomin.txt

We left there and headed back to our cities. Arshal, from our group, made a comment that the road and areas reminded her of Dilijan. And in fact, with all the greenery and a monastery at the end of the road, it was a very appropriate comparison. It suddenly clicked for me – it was 30 years ago today that I left the homeland and made it back to America – I left the roads of Dilijan, searching of a monastery in my own life.

Time passes. Things change, but with those changes we find traces of visions and elements that draw us to the constant threads that weave through our lives and pull it all together. What really matters is how we’ve spent our time. We come full circle in life. It’s a recycling process, because in the end we all belong to the whole and therefore each of us belongs to the other.

This was a mini-pilgrimage that lived up to its name.

 

Some comments from “MyChurch”
Anush Avejic
Anush Avejic May 27, 2008
This is a beautifully written blog. And I’m not just saying that. When I was looking through the San Jose slides that Suzie posted, I saw the Arbor day plaque and I knew, right off, that it was from that Arbor Day that Susan chaired. I remember the photos…of Varoujan in Armenian costume. Reading your blog was like going through a scrapbook of memories. I remembered the little house that was used for worship….that stood where St. Andrew stands today. Remember that stained glass window we donated to make the little house more church-like in appearance? : ) I remembered Karine’s beautiful smile when she was just a little one, and then remembered being at St. Andrew this past November and seeing what a beautiful young woman she’s become with a family of her own…and I remembered hearing her play Junk just for you after church.
Thank you for this blog. It was filled with beautiful memories that needed a little coaxing forward on this day after memorial day!
Suzie
Suzie May 27, 2008
it was an incredibly special weekend… reliving memories and creating more memories and being part of something so much greater than yourself, yet realizing that even as a tiny speck we have an important function of connecting one another in this circle of life. i’m still very high and energized from our weekend. anush jan, we missed you but you were definitely with us in spirit!

 

 

 

Celebrating (not mourning) Sardarabad – 90 years later

 

I love the song “Sardarabad.” I love the first lines… “Yerp chi munoom yelk noo jar, khenteru en kdnoom hunar…” [roughly translated = When there exist NO means of resolution or no remedy, the crazy ones find the means!] These words have been a guiding riff for me, challenging me to look beyond the limits. In fact, it probably goes hand-in-hand with my policy that it’s always easier to ask for forgiveness than permission.

 

Sardarabad is our Armenian national victory!  We stood up against the Turks and won! Did you catch that – we won! We held off the Turkish advance! And that’s exciting! I mean, like think about our history… we talk about King Tigran – but that’s a couple of millennium ago. So after all the massacres and genocides throughout our history, there is this small little battle – at Sardarabad – that shines as a political/military victory. Its not a major conquest by any stretch of the imagination, but it’s certainly on the list of victories for our small group of people – the Armenians.

 

And – THIS year – 2008 – is the 90th Anniversary of the Battle of Sardarabad! You know how we love those round numbers! So, is there any better time to celebrate? Let’s make some noise! This is Armenia’s victory and we’re going to celebrate! Right?

 

Well… you can imagine my disappointment and frustration when I received a directive from the Diocese last week, ordering all the churches to commemorate the 90th Anniversary of Sardarabad with… (can you guess?) with… a Requiem Service!!! (Hokehankist!)

 

Wow! One of the only battles we win – even Avarayr (Vartanantz) has a twist, where we commemorate Vartan Mamikonian as a fallen hero. But Sardarabad is a win-win. Now, I’m all for honoring the spirit of the dead, but come on, is this it? Is this the only direction in which the Armenian Church can steer us? In all fairness to the diocese, the directive signed by the Primate, did mention that the order had come from the top – that the Catholicos has asked for the requiem in all of the churches. But this only makes the situation sadder.

 

In scripture we read that before a certain man would follow Jesus, he asked if he could go and bury his father. Jesus replies, “Follow me, and let the dead bury the dead.” (Matt. 8:22) Don’t we, as the Church, have an obligation to order the same words to our people? Instead, we’re not only freeing them from the bonds of death, we’re (with directives such as this) sending them right back to the grave.

 

Sure, mourn the dead, but at some point realize that what the angel said to the oil-bearing women – “Why do you search for the living among the dead?” (Luke 24:5) is what the people are now saying to our church.

 

So what’s an alternative? How about a celebration of resurrection, instead of the requiem? How about explaining to our people that the Holy Eucharist holds within it the power to go beyond the grave? How about a party, where bishops and priests dance with the people in a celebration of victory? Did you hear/read Sara Miles’ experience with the Eucharist? http://www.prx.org/pieces/25794-this-i-believe-sara-miles

A few years back I decided to have my left lobe poked. It was interesting to see the reaction of the people to a priest with an earring. I wrote a small piece in the church newsletter “Nakhagoch” at the time. In its entirety –http://armodoxy.blogspot.com/1993/06/guns-earrings.html – but the portion that I direct you to:

I have never hidden the fact that I don’t care to live up to these misdirected stereotypes we have of priests. A priest, as a servant of God, must celebrate life; after all it is the greatest gift God has given us. A priest must live with a zeal and excitement for life. He must be a listener of music, a singer of songs, a orator of poetry and a dreamer for the romantic. Life is here to be lived, not to be hidden away in the recesses of darkness.

The purpose of religion is to bear witness to that celebration. There is a genuine beauty in life which demands us to partake and celebrate. Christ tells us, “I came that they may have life, and have it abundantly.” (John 10:10) Sure, life has its share of difficulties and problems, but our religion gives us an opportunity to rise above those pains.

 

It’s in this same spirit that I challenge us as the inheritors of Armenian Orthodoxy today, to go beyond the requiems, to look at the power of love and the power of devotion. If not, then yes, a requiem would be most appropriate, but not for the dead at Sardarabad – but for a church that has lost touch with life and living.

 

 

Fallen Grains of Wheat – Revisted

At the Requiem Service in the Armenian Orthodox Church, the Holy Gospel according to St. John, is read.

Arguably, it is the most heard passage in the Armenian Church today, considering that more Armenian Christians would rather huddle around a requiem service than the Eucharist… I’m tempted to say that, that is another issue. But its not. Its part of the same issue.This week, Armenian clergymen will be called up to ‘perform’ requiem services for the departed martyrs of 1915. This passage will again be heard by every Armenian who attends these gatherings.
John 12:24-26 … “Very truly, I tell you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains a single grain, but if it dies, it bears much fruit. Those who love their life lose it and those who hate their life in this world will keep it for eternal life. Whoever serves me must follow me, and where I am there will my servant be also. Whoever serves me, the Father will honor.” (NRSV)
Several years ago I worked on a project that I called “The Teotig Database” – while meditating on the above passage, I wrote this article for Window magazine. Here’s a revisit – 93 years after the assassination of a people…
FALLEN GRAINS OF WHEAT
by Fr. Vazken Movsesian (Window Quarterly, Spring 1990)
The word “martyr” conjures many images in our minds. Most of those images have little, if any, relevance for life today. Martyrdom is an abstract idea for most. Every April 24, Armenians are reintroduced to the word. A martyr, we are told, is one who voluntarily opts for death rather than deny his faith. Like a cliche, the definition rolls off our tongues with ease as we ascribe it to the 1.5 million Armenians of the 1915 Genocide.
Like all Armenians, I had heard the word used. I had heard the stories of family and friends. I had read the books. I had even given my share of “Martyrs’ Day” speeches, but “martyr” never had more meaning than after reading Teotig’s “Golgotha of the Armenian Clergy” [see note at the end of article]. It was no longer an abstract term. Furthermore, I found the Armenian Church of 1915 in a paradoxical situation. Superficially, what appeared to be a church on the verge of death, was in fact the Armenian Church living it’s most vibrant days of Christian witness.
BEYOND THE NUMBERS
Now that Teotig’s material has been transcribed and processed, the data can be evaluated in many ways. In mere numbers alone, it is evident that the Armenian Church suffered immensely. Seventy five years after the fact, we still have a long road toward recovery. Teotig’s work, however, presents much more than numbers. My intention here is not to analyze the data rather it is to reflect on the actions of these clergy and the implications of those actions for us. The documentation of the massacres gives us real life stories, examples, of clergymen, from whom we, as clergy and faithful of the Church 75 years removed from the tragedy, have much to learn. Although a few of the clergy of 1915 denied their faith, the overwhelming majority did not compromise themselves as Christians and became worthy of the title “martyr.” These clerics lead the Armenian people through that same road of martyrdom. Today, in retrospect, we have some serious questions to ask ourselves regarding the value of that decision and action. But first let us look at the pre-Genocide Church, which obviously was a more viable institution than the Armenian Church today, by virtue of more clergy, greater and closer contact with the people, Her ability to operate within hostile circumstances and most importantly, by the fact that Her followers did not abandon Her in these trying times.
What was the drawing power of the pre-Genocide Church? Why were Armenians determined not to compromise their faith, the Faith of the Orthodox Church? In the village of Kuvner, Bitlis, for example, the 400 Armenian families out of fear of persecution practiced their “worship” — not private prayer, but organized worship — in their homes.
How did the Church move men such that they refused worldly pursuits and survival, opting for the Cross instead? For example, Daniel Der Stephanian, a young revolutionary, immigrated to the United States in 1909 but returned to Gudoutz’s St. Garabed monastery, was ordained as Fr. Stephan and as a priest lead his suffering people. Or, Fr. Vartan Hagopian (Moush, Bitlis), who upon noticing that the Kurdish-speaking Armenians of Slivan (Dikranagerd) were without a pastor and on the verge of religious conversion notified the Patriarch and was assigned to the region. Fr. Vartan was martyred with his flock after returning them to the fold of the Mother Church.
What kept the clergymen loyal to the Church despite the hardships and humiliation they had to bear because of their association? In Sepastia, from the prelate down to the parish priest, clerics could not walk the streets without ridicule from the Turks. As an everyday ritual the Turks would curse and blaspheme the Armenian’s cross and faith. In Bourhan, when the village executioner finished torturing Fr. Khoren Hambartzoumian with unthinkable methods, as an ultimate indignation, he placed a dog in Fr. Khoren’s lap and demanded that the good priest baptize the mutt. Fr. Khoren was butchered.
What was the redeeming value of the Faith that these priest would demand from their parishioners loyalty until the end? Fr. Ashod Avedian, (Erzeroum) was among 4000 men separated from the women in the village of Tzitogh and shackled together. He counseled the men to be brave in the face of death, having them pray in unison, “Lord, have mercy.” And in the only sacramental gesture possible, he had the men take the “cursed” soil and swallow it as communion while confessing, “For all the sins which I have committed, in thought….” Questions about the authority and influence of the Holy Church continue to form within our minds as we read the multitude of stories of the men who not only preached the Faith but lived and died for it. The Church carried great weight in the lives of the people in 1915 as underscored by their martyrdom. Interestingly enough, the Church was not viewed as sanctuary, as is common during times of crisis.
The Armenian Church of 1915 was anything but a safe haven or refuge for Her people. As Teotig writes, “At that time the intolerance of the three Islamic nations (the Turks, the Persian and the Kurds) toward Christianity had reached its pinnacle.” The Armenian clergy were the symbols of Christianity that the Muslim Turks were fanatically molesting. To be associated with the Armenian Church, let alone be a part of it, was the same as signing one’s own execution orders. We refer to the victims of the Genocide as martyrs precisely for this reason: they willingly opted for association with the Church — to be identified as Christians — and were therefore denied existence.
Here lies the key to our questioning. The martyrdom of the people tells us that the Church in fact filled more than a social need for them. The pre-Genocide Armenian Church was exclusively a house of God. She was the Christian identity of the people and not much else. Because Armenians lived within their millet, Armenian community life was already defined. The Church did not have to take on the responsibility of perpetuating the nation. She had a tremendous influence within the lives of the people, because the people understood it as God ordained. Armenians did not understand, “In the world you have tribulation: but courage! I have overcome the world,” (Jn. 16:33) as a statement made by a mere mortal but by the Living God. Armenians took to heart the assurance, “Blessed are you when men revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven…” (Mt. 5:11-12) because it was guaranteed by the Saviour of the World.How else can we explain or understand martyrdom? It is only in these terms. Given the option to live or die, who would chose death, unless of course, the person had a doubtless belief that the “Lord is my Shepherd… even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I fear no evil; for thou art with me…” (Ps. 23:1,4). Who would take the torture and humiliation of the cross, unless one knew for certain that the cross was not an end, but a means to the end. The Armenian Christian martyr of 1915 firmly believed in the resurrection of Christ and the guarantee of the same for his/herself.
The operative word in the definition of martyrdom is “willingly,” which implies the victims had the option to do otherwise. Some of the sources for Teotig were in fact converts to Islam. These were the few that were able to escape and live to tell the story. Teotig refers to the conversion as acceptance of the “severe order” (khisd hraman). By way of explanation, he inserts within parenthesis the word “Islamized.” Though the number of these converts was relatively minuscule, the fact that some converted asserts that the option for conversion, and therefore life was available.

THE TRUE LOSSES OF THE CHURCH

The 1915 Church in Turkey was well established by virtue of Her existence within the Armenian communities for centuries. The Armenian Church in the diaspora has only a living history of 75-100 years. The Church today is built upon the ruins of 1915. The losses of the Armenian Church were far greater than the decrease in the number of clergy. The Church lost Her impact over Armenians and lost Her place as a necessity among Her people. Her preoccupation with survival in the post-Genocide years moved Her from the sacred realm to the secular. The objective of the Church was compromised by the necessity to build. The devastation of the Genocide was too great upon Church leadership so there was no one “manning the ship.”

Meanwhile, we the post-genocide generations, found ourselves rebuilding without the proper “floor plans.” For us, the Church was not only a religious organization but a means toward national preservation. Without the necessary religious grounding, coupled with societal norms which advocate no absolutes, God lost us to the temptation of self- assurance. If the Armenian Church was to be rebuilt, it was because of our own efforts, we thought, and not God’s will. God was helpless. After all, where was God when we needed him most? Surely He did not have the power to rebuild our nation? God lost His strength and most importantly His healing power. The Armenian nation had been severely wounded and if anyone was going to heal us, it would be ourselves. And so, our community and church shifted from God-centeredness to self-centeredness. Our heroes changed. We began singing the praises of self-made industrialists who were now financing, rebuilding and healing the Church.
ELI, ELI, LAMA SABACH-THANI?
Perhaps one of the most pondered questions by people is, why evil? Many volumes on this subject line the shelves of theological and philosophical libraries. The question is simple: If God is good and if God is omnipotent then why does evil exist? Either God is not good or God is not all- powerful (e.g. He has no dominion over evil). The attempt at defending God’s goodness or omnipotence in the face of evil is called a theodicy.
Armenians at the time of the Genocide as well as today continue to ask this question. The Genocide of 1915 and more recently the earthquake of 1988 have both given us the necessary ammunition to lash out against a seemingly weak god, who accepts our loyalties throughout the centuries and abandons us in our time of need. Could God have not prevented the execution of Talaat’s orders? Could God have not prevented the extensive destruction of the earthquake?As a pastor I have been asked the same question from parishioners who are confronted with a manifestation of evil in their lives. Why cancer? Why divorce? Why young death? The deeper questions begin to surface: Does God hear our prayers? Is it fate? Is it our destiny? Ultimately, it is the Church that is on trial. Why advocate a faith in a god who is seemingly powerless against pain? The answer is by no means an easy one. In fact, as Teotig’s documentation has shown, the Church has not been spared Her share of evil. Ironically, this may very well be the beginnings of an Armenian Church theodicy.
The Church, as the Body of Christ was not rescued from evil, as neither was the actual Body of Christ, the Son of the Omnipotent. The crucifixion of our Lord Jesus Christ is the Church’s crucifixion. Theologian Hans Kung writes, “The crucified Jesus is present in the Church as the risen Lord. Christ does not exist without the Church, the Church does not exist without Christ. Christ is for the Church not only an event in a constantly receding past, nor only an event in the future, whether near or distant. … The Church does not derive its life only from the work which Christ did and finished in the past, nor only from the expected future consummation of his work, but from the living and efficacious presence of Christ in the present” (The Church).The crucifixion of our Lord is not to be understood as a one time event, centered in first century Palestine. During the Divine Liturgy, we herald, “Christ is among us… He who is God is here seated.” We are invited to commune with Christ who is– not was –sacrificed and shared among us. We are called to share in His resurrection, as well as His passion and crucifixion.
At the Turkish “Golgotha,” the Body of Christ was nailed to the Cross. In that misery, the Armenian Church asked the same question Jesus asked, “My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken me” (Mt. 27:46). Today, we echo that appeal in our personal lives as well as on behalf of the Church, only to receive the same seemingly silent answer. That answer is only assumed silent when our ears are not attuned to an existence beyond this temporal one. Among the disciples who were at the foot of the Jesus’ cross, certainly some thought His teachings were in vain if His loving Father was not willing to come to His rescue. But to those who trusted His teachings, their fear diminished with the anticipation of resurrection. We too are not privy to the answer, unless first we are able to trust the living words of Christ and be ready to stand in eternal vigil for the resurrection.
God’s interaction with our world can not be confined to our limited understanding of time and justice. God does not prevent evil. This does not diminish the power of God nor His goodness. It shifts the responsibility to us — to be convinced by our faith and by the crucified and living Lord among us, that God’s love is greater than our sense of justice. St. Nersess Shnorhali writes in the hymn of the Saturday matins, “Do not judge us by justice, rather by Your mercy grant us expiation.” Justice is grounded in our temporal existence, God’s mercy transcends to the eternal. The healing power of God, to fix our wounds and abrasions is in His love not in our understanding of justice. If the resurrection of the Armenian people and Church is dependent upon human strength alone, it is doomed to fail as are all enterprises which are built upon limited faculties. The Church survives today because of human efforts. She lives today because of Christ’s eternal presence.
The Armenian clergy at the turn of the century were martyred with this understanding of Divine intervention. It is foolish to say they did not fear death; however, it is apparent from their martyrdom that they did not understand death as the final stop in a life running on hurt and pain. They believed and were convinced in the resurrection of Christ. The clergy of 1915 offer an understanding of the Church prior to Her children’s physical and spiritual breakdown. At that time, the faith of the Armenian Church was no different than the faith it expounds today. What has changed however, is our perception. As workers of the Church today we have a mission to revert back to this basic understanding of the Church. The Church does not need healing, rather we do. Healing — God’s healing — begins when we accept the Armenian Church as the Body of Christ, where our Lord lives in His Crucifixion and Resurrection. Otherwise, we are merely placing a bandage on our wounds. It is temporary, it is deceptive and will yield scare tissue.
In light of Teotig, martyrdom can no longer be an abstract idea. Rather, it is part of our commission as sons and daughters of the Armenian Church. Thank God today the Armenian Christians in America are not being forced at gun point to witness to their faith. Yet the pressure from worldly pursuits, the temptation to deny good in the face of personal gain, and the defining of the world as self-serving rather than God-serving all take their tolls upon our faith. These are the new weapons of evil. Do we question why God is not sparing us prosperity? If that prosperity has cost us our self- worth then is that not evil? Would we ever lash out against God and ask, why He is not saving us from material success? If that success has been acquired at the cost of the sanctity of family and the loss of principles, is that not evil?
Evil will always be present. It is part of a system built upon human free will. In the Garden of Eden it was the serpent, in 1915 it was the Turk, today it is the self, each demanding primary loyalty. Martyrdom for us is a denial of the evil and opting for life. This is true in our personal life as well as communal life. It begins with the acceptance of an eternal life, a life based on the will of God, a life which defines justice by God’s love and mercy.
Throughout Teotig, we read of priests who dedicated their lives to the service of the Church. Yet, tragically, many of them did not have graves nor a Church funeral. To their memory, I wish to present the Gospel passage from the funeral service. “Unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit. He who loves his life loses it, and he who hates his life in this world will keep it for eternal life” (Jn. 12:24-25). The pastors of 1915 dedicated their lives to God’s Holy Church. They denied the pleasures of this life for the riches of eternal life. Like grains of wheat, they fell and died. The Faith, the Faith of the Armenian Church is the fruit they bear. As we pray to God for their eternal rest, let us at the same time partake of this fruit. This in fact is our greatest tribute to their martyrdom and their blessed memory.
——————- Note ————————————
By 1921, only six years after the Genocide, a scribe using the pen name “Teotig” had compiled a volume of Armenian Church casualties entitled, “Golgotha of the Armenian Clergy”. Chronicled in this book are the perils of the Armenian Church during the 1915 Genocide. For the first time, the 412 page work written in Armenian has been transcribed into English and set as a data base by the A.C.R.A. Group research team.
The book introduces the reader to 1252 clergymen specifically, with brief biographical information and descriptions of the atrocities imposed upon these clerics. This volume by no means is an exhaustive list of losses suffered by the Armenian Church in 1915. Teotig assures the reader that some lists are fragmented and certain towns and villages had no remaining survivors from whom information could be gathered. For instance, in the town of Hiusenig, (near Kharbert) all the priests were murdered along with the townspeople. Clergy records did not survive. The same is true of the village of Khoylou as well as other localities.
Nevertheless, Teotig’s work presents a strong base and by all means is a monumental effort. It allows us to take a glimpse at the pre-Genocide Armenian Church and to understand the magnitude of the damage to the Church, to Her people and the spiritual decay which has ensued in the Armenian Church community over the past 75 years.

Golgotha of the Armenian Clergy is full of horror stories page after page, all tied together by a common thread of suffering and martyrdom. Teotig interviewed and compiled data from a variety of sources, many were first hand witnesses and clergy who escaped the atrocities one way or another. To understand the scope of his work, he confesses that the massacres were so precisely orchestrated that often villagers did not know of the destruction in a neighboring village a mile away. Yet he was able to compile and document the witness of 1252 of these clergy and their flocks.

The register includes among the most notable victims, Gomidas Vartabed Soghomonian to the most seemingly obscure, such as Krikor Kahana Zartarian, a priest of Sepastia whose finger nails were pulled, horse shoes nailed to his feet and then his skin was butchered off his body, because of his refusal to deny his faith.It is more than evident that the Armenian Church suffered immensely in numbers alone.

Seventy five years after the fact, we still have a long road toward recovery. The Armenian population has steadily increased but the number of clergy to meet the ever growing needs of the people has not.
***